Walsall Council’s planning committee has refused three applications for children’s homes at 5 Highgate Close, 10 Grove Way, and 43 St Ives Road, despite planning officers recommending approval for each. The decision comes after concerns were raised about traffic congestion, parking shortages, and potential safety risks in the neighborhoods.
The planning officers had supported the applications to house two to three children, deeming them suitable with conditions. However, council members expressed reservations at the meeting on October 30, emphasizing local infrastructure strain and the character of the areas.
At Highgate Close, residents objected to what they perceived as an overconcentration of similar facilities, along with parking difficulties and fears of antisocial behaviour. Gelander Brookes, representing the applicant, stressed the home would offer a safe and nurturing environment. Yet, Councillor Aftab Nawaz proposed refusal, citing insufficient parking, detrimental impact on the area’s character, and excessive commercialisation. The vote ended tied at six to six, leaving Chairman Councillor Mike Bird to cast the deciding vote against the plans. Councillor Mark Statham cautioned that refusal may be overturned on appeal.
READ MORE: Premier Inn Hockley Heath Set for Significant Expansion with 14 New Rooms
READ MORE: Labour Signals Potential Fuel Duty Hike Affecting Tesco, Asda, and Sainsbury’s Petrol Prices
The Grove Way application faced objections related to highway safety, parking, and proximity to a public right of way. Altina Elias of Keys for Life Ltd argued the home’s impact would not exceed that of the current use and denied any link to increased antisocial behaviour. This was the second committee review after a previous deferral, with concerns about West Midlands Police’s withdrawn objection. Councillor Suky Samra led the refusal proposal, highlighting intensified property use and potential harm to local amenities. Council lawyer Alison Sargent noted that objectors’ claims are unlikely to hold up in an appeal.
The application for St Ives Road was rejected over severe highway safety concerns. Councillor Bird criticized the site’s location as highly unsuitable, pointing out access issues, congested parking, and proximity to a fire hydrant and park entrance. Local ward member Councillor Gurmeet Sohal described the street’s safety situation as already at “breaking point.” Lovemore Goromonzi, representing the applicant, stated the home’s use would be comparable or lighter than an average family residence. Councillor Nick Gandham moved to refuse based on inadequate parking and highway safety, which was supported by the committee.
Despite unanimous refusals, councillors acknowledged the vital role of children’s homes, but maintained that infrastructure and safety considerations must take precedence.