<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>unreasonable on Birmingham Daily</title><link>https://birminghamdaily.co.uk/tags/unreasonable/</link><description>Recent content in unreasonable on Birmingham Daily</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 05:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://birminghamdaily.co.uk/tags/unreasonable/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Government Inspector Overturns Solihull Council’s Refusal, Labels It ‘Unreasonable’</title><link>https://birminghamdaily.co.uk/government-inspector-overturns-solihull-councils-refusal-labels-it-unreasonable/</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 05:30:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://birminghamdaily.co.uk/government-inspector-overturns-solihull-councils-refusal-labels-it-unreasonable/</guid><description>A government planning inspector has once again overruled Solihull Council, deeming the authority’s decision to refuse a home extension application “unreasonable.” This marks another costly setback for the council and a victory for local residents.
The case concerns an extension proposal at a residence on Station Road, Knowle. Mr. and Mrs. Woodbridge submitted their application last October, seeking permission for a first-floor side extension, a single-storey rear infill extension, and a loft dormer to create an en-suite.</description></item><item><title>Solihull Council Penalized for Unreasonable Conduct in Shirley Planning Appeal</title><link>https://birminghamdaily.co.uk/solihull-council-penalized-for-unreasonable-conduct-in-shirley-planning-appeal/</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 04:50:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://birminghamdaily.co.uk/solihull-council-penalized-for-unreasonable-conduct-in-shirley-planning-appeal/</guid><description>A recent planning appeal in Shirley has highlighted issues with Solihull Council’s decision-making process. A government planning inspector has overturned the council’s refusal of a property extension, ruling that the council acted unreasonably during the appeal. As a result, the council has been ordered to cover the appellant’s costs.
The dispute centered on a homeowner’s proposed extension, which was initially denied by the council. Upon review, the planning inspector found that the council’s objections lacked sufficient justification and failed to consider relevant planning policies adequately.</description></item></channel></rss>