<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>boundarychanges on Birmingham Daily</title><link>https://birminghamdaily.co.uk/tags/boundarychanges/</link><description>Recent content in boundarychanges on Birmingham Daily</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 04:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://birminghamdaily.co.uk/tags/boundarychanges/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Narrow Margins and Future Contests: Solihull’s Slim Election Victories and Councillors Facing Voters Again</title><link>https://birminghamdaily.co.uk/narrow-margins-and-future-contests-solihulls-slim-election-victories-and-councillors-facing-voters-again/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 04:30:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://birminghamdaily.co.uk/narrow-margins-and-future-contests-solihulls-slim-election-victories-and-councillors-facing-voters-again/</guid><description>Last week’s local elections in Solihull revealed just how finely balanced many wards truly are, with several races decided by only a few votes. The results dramatically shifted the political landscape—the council is now under no overall control, setting the stage for intriguing contests in the coming years.
This year’s all-out election was a rare event prompted by boundary changes, requiring all 51 council seats to be contested simultaneously. Starting next year, the council will resume its usual cycle of electing one-third of councillors each year for three years out of every four.</description></item></channel></rss>