Craig Revel Horwood, known as the ‘nasty’ judge on Strictly Come Dancing, surprised fans and contestants alike with a rare perfect 10 score for actor Lewis Cope’s Halloween performance. The longest-serving judge on the panel hasn’t given out a 10 this early in the competition for four years, a fact revealed by host Claudia Winkleman.
Despite his reputation for harsh critiques and often being booed by the audience, Craig couldn’t hide his admiration for Lewis’s performance. “I didn’t want to, obviously,” he admitted. “He forced me to—it was just so good. I couldn’t find a single thing I would change or that was wrong with it. I couldn’t even offer a suggestion of improvement.”
Craig praised the seamless blend of music, dance, costumes, concept, and synchronicity. “When all those elements come together, I have no choice but to give it a 10,” he said. “I thought it was absolutely incredible. I thought Lewis was insanely delicious.”
READ MORE: BBC Star Sister Wendy Beckett: The Nun Who Gave Away Her Fortune and Lived in an Empty Caravan
READ MORE: Five Years on the Run: The Elusive Search for Violent Fugitive Dann Hudson
In a candid interview, Craig also reflected on how his judging style has evolved. Former Strictly pro Ola Jordan remarked that Craig had “lost his sparkle” due to toning down his approach, and Craig confirmed that he has mellowed his direct critique to avoid backlash and potential “cancelling.”
“Back 21 years ago, I could be more direct,” he explained. “Now, I try to be honest and upfront with the contestants but always tag on a positive to help them grow and gain confidence.”
He emphasized his commitment to honesty without harshness for effect. “As long as I am honest and not being harsh for effect or personal gain, no one can really go against that.”
Reflecting on past judgments, Craig admitted, “I was really harsh 20 years ago. When I look back, I think, ‘Ooh, that’s cutting.’ It would now be classed as bullying, and then I’d be cancelled.”
Through these changes, Craig has found a balance between truthful critique and support, adapting to the evolving cultural landscape while maintaining his integrity as a judge.