The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is reportedly exploring changes to Personal Independence Payment (PIP) following plans by the Labour government under Andy Burnham. The proposed reforms could see a new system replace PIP, currently claimed by around four million people.
According to sources within the department, a distinct approach may be introduced for claimants under 25 years old, potentially involving reduced or withdrawn entitlements. However, individuals over 50 could be shielded from some of the proposed changes, with considerations being made on whether a cut-off age between 50 and 60 should apply.
DWP officials are developing updated eligibility criteria and assessment methods to better reflect the extra costs faced by disabled people. Crucially, those with the most severe and debilitating disabilities are expected to maintain their current level of support and not face reassessment.
READ MORE: DWP hosts Birmingham Youth Jobs Fair with immediate job offers
READ MORE: DWP confirms support plans for neurodivergent benefits claimants
A DWP spokesperson emphasised that forthcoming reviews by Milburn and Timms, scheduled for autumn, will form the basis for sustainable reform and that the department will not anticipate their findings. The spokesperson also highlighted ongoing changes, including the youth guarantee programme, efforts to reduce the gap between universal credit standard and health-related rates, the restoration of face-to-face assessments, and a record investment of £3.5 billion in employment support for disabled individuals and those with long-term conditions.
Commitment was reiterated to maintain a safety net for the most vulnerable and those unable to work.
This comes shortly after DWP minister Pat McFadden addressed the need for significant welfare changes to support young people into employment. He described the situation as a “moral crusade” to prevent young people from becoming trapped on sickness benefits. McFadden cited statistics indicating that a 20-year-old starting on sickness benefits is more likely to remain on them a decade later than to have held steady employment during that time.
He stressed the serious consequences of youth unemployment, noting that those left out of work face a higher early mortality rate compared to their peers who remained employed, and described the situation as “shameful” and unacceptable, calling for urgent change.