The Department for Work and Pensions is exploring potential changes to Personal Independence Payment (PIP) for all claimants under the age of 25, meaning those born after 2001.
One option reportedly under consideration by the Labour Party government involves implementing a distinct system for this younger age group, which could include reducing or withdrawing entitlements. These proposals remain under review, pending findings from two ongoing assessments led by Alan Milburn and the Timms Review, which are specifically examining the DWP’s PIP processes.
The Timms Review published an interim report in July 2026 outlining initial findings and future areas of investigation. The report highlights widespread dissatisfaction among claimants, with over 90% of submissions describing negative experiences when applying for PIP.
READ MORE: DWP Considers Additional Changes to Motability Scheme for PIP and DLA Recipients
The review found that many disabled people view the PIP system as unfair and inconsistent. It seeks to assess the impact of the assessment process on claimants’ health and whether it effectively addresses their support needs.
The report also states that both claimants and the general public lack confidence in PIP and its claims procedure. There is a noted increase in stigma and negative perceptions of disability amid intensified public and political scrutiny. The steering group aims to understand the effects of claiming PIP and how trust in the system can be restored.
Shelley Hopkinson, Head of Policy and Influencing at Turn2us, said the Timms Review represents a vital chance to not only improve PIP’s operation but also to reshape its core principles. She emphasised that PIP is essential support for disabled people and those with long-term health conditions, helping them manage additional costs and engage fully in society.
Hopkinson noted that discussions often centre on the financial cost of PIP rather than the experiences of claimants. She criticised stigmatising narratives, inflexible assessments, and low trust in decision-making as significant factors influencing whether people apply, receive appropriate support, and maintain confidence in the system.
She concluded that the review’s recommendations must lead to a trustworthy system offering adequate financial assistance, fair assessments, and respectful treatment throughout the process.