Plans to build two five-bedroom houses on Barr Lakes Lane in Walsall’s protected conservation area have stirred significant controversy, with local experts and residents demanding that the decision be reconsidered by the council’s planning committee.
The development application was initially approved by Walsall Council’s planning committee on June 19, 2025, despite objections from half of the statutory consultees, including conservation officers, ecologists, highway authorities, and planning policy advisors. Even the council’s principal solicitor warned that approving the plans could put the authority in a legally vulnerable position.
Patrick Cluxton, a local planning consultant and Barr Beacon resident, has publicly criticized the original approval, calling it “hopelessly wrong.” He argues that the approval contradicts core elements of the National Planning Policy Framework as well as local planning policies protecting the green belt and conservation areas.
READ MORE: Marks & Spencer to Close Swansea Oxford Street Store, Putting Over 90 Jobs at Risk
READ MORE: HMRC Warns Against Risky Early Access to Private Pensions
Although the committee resolved to approve the plans, a formal decision notice has yet to be issued nearly eight months later. Council officials say this delay results from pending requirements for additional documentation and the completion of legal obligations related to the project.
Cluxton questions whether the council’s planning services can override the committee’s original decision and issue a refusal instead. He suggests that returning the application to the planning committee would allow members to reconsider the amendment proposals and potentially reject the project, restoring compliance with planning policies and safeguarding the green belt.
Concerns have also been raised regarding the heritage statement submitted with the application. Notably, it lacks an identified author or consulting firm, casting doubt on its validity. Cluxton emphasizes that heritage assessments should be conducted by qualified heritage consultants and warns that accepting substandard reports could set a dangerous precedent.
“If you approve building two houses on this green belt site, it could open the door for similar developments anywhere in protected areas,” Cluxton explains. “Violating green belt and conservation policies once invites further exploitation by developers.”
He urges either a committee reconsideration or for legal and planning services to collaborate in overruling the original decision by issuing a formal refusal.
Walsall Council has been contacted for comment but has yet to respond.